Similarly, 2 × 106 CD19+ B cells were added to equal numbers of iDC in the presence or absence selleck chemicals of the pan-RAR selective antagonist ER50891 (Tocris Biosciences, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at a final concentration of 1 μM for 72 h. The B cells and/or DC were subsequently isolated by magnet assistance for further analysis. Statistically relevant differences among means (Student’s t-test, analysis of variance: anova) and medians (paired Wilcoxon’s test) were ascertained using GraphPad Prism version 4 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). In all statistical analyses, a P-value < 0·05 was considered to represent

statistically significant differences. We have shown previously that T1D patients treated with cDC or iDC exhibit an increase in the frequency of B220+CD11c– cells in the peripheral blood [31]. Flow cytometry of these cells [31] suggested that they represented a late transitional B cell population that shared some cell surface proteins (CD5+CD10+CD24+CD38intermediate) with at least one population of human Bregs recently reported and characterized [23, 32, 33]). Thus, we hypothesized that the increase in the frequency of B220+CD11c– cells in DC recipients was

a consequence see more of, and reflected an increase in, the number of constituent suppressive immunoregulatory B cell populations that express B220 on the surface, even though B220 on its own does not define B cells [29, 30]. We discovered subsequently that a population of CD19+B220+CD11c– IL-10+ cells accounted for an average of 48% of the B220+CD11c– cells (V. D. C., B. P. and N. G., unpublished data) and, more importantly, that the CD19+B220+CD11c– IL-10+ population was immunosuppressive in Buspirone HCl vitro [31]. To date, two human B cell populations with immunosuppressive ability in vitro have been characterized, mainly by cell

surface markers [23, 25, 26, 32, 40]. Although both populations produce IL-10, their surface phenotypes are different. ‘B10’ Bregs express the CD1d and CD5 markers [25, 26], whereas the other suppressive cells are characterized specifically as CD19+CD24+/intermediateCD38+/intermediate [23, 32, 40]. We first asked if the suppressive properties of the CD19+B220+CD11c– IL-10+ B cells shown in [31] were concentrated in either or both of the currently characterized Bregs (CD19+CD1d+CD5+ or CD19+CD24+CD27+CD38+ B cells [23, 25, 26, 32, 40]), or if other novel CD19+ cell populations inside the parental CD19+B220+CD11c– IL-10+ cell population possessed suppressive ability. Using flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. S1 shows the approach), we determined that CD19+CD24+CD27+CD38+ cells accounted for 19·85% (median) of FACS-sorted CD11c–B220+CD19+ IL-10+ cells from freshly acquired PBMC (Fig. 1a; n = 6 healthy unrelated adult individuals). We did not detect any B10 Bregs (CD19+CD1d+CD5+ IL-10+ cells) [25] inside the CD11c–B220+CD19+ IL-10+ population (not shown).