Early clinical studies failed to confirm that adjuvant chemothera

Early clinical studies failed to confirm that adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival. In 2009, a meta-analysis of 12 randomized clinical trials analyzed 3809 patients [7]. The hazard ratio for OS was 0.78 (95% CI = 0.71-0.85) in favor of chemotherapy. The most recently published meta-analysis evaluated data from 34 randomized trials that compared adjuvant systemic chemotherapy to surgery

alone and were conducted in both Asian and Western populations [8]. The risk of death among patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was reduced by 15% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85). To date, two large-scale phase III clinical trials have demonstrated a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery with D2 lymphadenectomy. One selleck chemicals llc was the Japanese adjuvant chemotherapy trial of TS-1 for gastric cancer (ACTS-GC) trial [9]. In the ACTS-GC trial, 1059 patients with stage II or III gastric cancer who had undergone a D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned to 6 months of S-1 versus surgery Selleckchem LY2109761 alone. Five-year OS was significantly better with S-1 (72% vs 61%). Another study was the Asian multicenter capecitabine and oxaliplatin adjuvant study in stomach cancer

(CLASSIC) trial, in which 1035 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer were randomly assigned to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) or observation after a D2 gastrectomy [10]. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in 3-year DFS (74% vs 59%; HR = 0.56) and OS (78% vs 69%; HR = 0.66) [11]. The optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen has not yet been established. There are several choices, including S-1 (used in the ACTS-GC trial) [10], XELOX (used in the CLASSIC trial) [11], capecitabine plus

cisplatin (used in the adjuvant Bay 11-7085 chemoradiation therapy in stomach cancer trial) [12] or epirubicin, cisplatin, and infused fluorouracil (used in the Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional chemotherapy trial) [13]. However, it is unclear which regimen is best or whether a superior alternative approach exists. Docetaxel is a novel antitumor drug that promotes microtubule assembly from tubulin dimers and inhibits the depolymerization of tubulin, thereby stabilizing microtubules in the cell. This results in the inhibition of DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis [14]. The efficacy of docetaxel monotherapy in AGC is only 15% to 24% [15]. The response rate of 5-FU/platinum-based treatment is approximately 22% to 65% [16]. Cisplatin and 5-FU synergize with docetaxel. The DCF regimen was first shown to have efficacy for the treatment of patients with AGC in a multinational TAX-325 trial [17]. On the basis of these results, docetaxel was approved in the United States and Europe for AGC. The role of the DCF regimen in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer is not clear. In this study, we show that the DCF regimen may also have a survival benefit when used as adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Comments are closed.