The reaction mixture (20 μL) contained 1× dd-PCR master mix (Bio-

The reaction mixture (20 μL) contained 1× dd-PCR master mix (Bio-Rad), 0.9 μM each primer, 1 μM probe and 1 μL template DNA. PCR amplification was carried out on a 2700 GeneAmp® PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster, USA). PCR was initiated at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 90 s, and 1 cycle at 98 °C for 10 min. Data were obtained and analyzed using the QX100™ droplet reader (Bio-Rad) and QuantaSoft software

(Bio-Rad). The QuantaSoft program generates absolute Ibrutinib ic50 quantities per microliter-reaction mixture (a total of 20 μL-reaction volume) from given numbers of positive droplets and negative droplets. The obtained values were multiplied by 20 to calculate quantities in microliter-DNA extracts. qPCR was performed

using an Applied Biosystems 7300 system as previously described [9]. dd-PCR was used in order to determine the concentrations of the external DNA calibrators with multiple probe sites [9] for qPCR because it accurately provides absolute quantification of target DNA [3], [4] and [6]. The 25-μL reaction mixture contained 1× PCR buffer, 0.2 μL Ace-Taq (Genenmed, Seoul, Korea), 0.3 mM dNTPs mix, 0.25 μM each primer, 0.15 μM probe, 1× ROX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA), 1× SYBR green I (Invitrogen) and 1 μL template DNA. PCR was initiated at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 55 °C for 90 s. Two artificial DNA templates with multiple probe sites were developed as reference http://www.selleck.co.jp/products/erastin.html DNA templates for qPCR of the 10 groups [9]. The two artificial sequences (509 bp long) contain Omipalisib clinical trial the target DNA region (amplified by the primer pair), with additional

flanking 20-bp DNA regions at the both ends. Plasmids with the artificial DNA templates were used to construct standard curves. They were serially diluted 10-fold. The two technologies did not detect DNA at <10−8 dilution (equivalent to 8 copies μL−1 as measured by dd-PCR). The 10 standard curves constructed by qPCR over the 10-fold serial dilution series (10−5–10−8) showed a slope value of 3.39 ± 0.14 (R2 = 0.99 ± 0.01), corresponding to a PCR efficiency of 97%. In order to compare the quantitative limits of detection, linearity and PCR efficiencies, the standard curves of several probes including msar, mcp, and msa were constructed using dd-PCR. The dd-PCR showed a slope value of 1.00 ± 0.03 (R2 = 0.99 ± 0.01), equivalent to 100% efficiency, over at least 4 orders of magnitude. Both technologies exhibited very similar levels of efficiency and linearity, with the same lower limits of detection. Quantification results were expressed as copy number microliter-DNA extract−1 for direct comparison. Each group was quantified from the three digesters using both technologies (Fig 1). mrtA, mcr-2b and Fen were not detected by either technology. dd-PCR detected seven groups from the digesters, while qPCR detected five groups.

Comments are closed.