Another approach is to study the organisms living at natural CO2 seeps which can be considered as a natural analogue for CO2 leakage. This volume presents data from three such sites; a deep water site in the northern Gulf of California, Mexico ( Pettit et al., 2013), a shallow water site near Vulcano Island in Italy ( Calosi et al., 2013 and Boatta et al., 2013) and a tropical site in Papua New Guinea ( Russell et al., 2013). To support the safe implementation of CCS, impact data gathered from laboratory and field experiments and from studies at analogue sites will need to be
used within a framework for environmental risk assessment. De Vries et al. (2013) explore a method to quantify the ecological risk associated with elevated CO2 levels using a Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD); an established approach for assessing risks from toxicants. The final key element in understanding consequence is to understand Ku-0059436 solubility dmso the water volume or sea
floor area impacted by harmful pH changes for given leakage scenarios. If deleterious impacts are spatially restricted then environmental concerns diminish and vice versa. Whilst defining leakage scenarios is problematic, due to lack of previous events’ it is possible BIBF 1120 mw to model hypothetical scenarios. Dewar et al. (2013) show how bubble plumes of CO2 could be expected to disperse and impact the surrounding water column. While this special issue does not seek to deliver the ‘last word’ on the subject of the biological consequences of CCS leakage, the papers it contains do constitute state-of-the-art understanding, combining as they do laboratory and field investigations. It is our hope that they will act as a springboard for further work into this pressing issue, but also provide
enough of a background to inform political decision makers, and public understanding, in terms of predicting, and managing the effects of future leaks, if such leaks do occur. As a word of caution, we remind readers that when contemplating the likely environmental risks associated with leakage Masitinib (AB1010) it is all too easy to focus solely on the severity of any biological impacts observed. However, a comprehensive appreciation of risk must also consider the likelihood that leakage will happen, the spatial and temporal extent over which any such leak would occur and the potential recovery of organisms and ecosystems once the leak has ceased. Whilst none of these issues are considered within the current issue, this should not detract from their importance. Finally, when weighing up the environmental risks associated with CO2 leakage from CCS we must not forget that if this CO2 had not been placed into geological reservoirs it would have most likely have been released into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change, from where it will have been absorbed by the oceans thus also exacerbating ocean acidification.