0; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, New York, USA) The subjects

0; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, New York, USA). The subjects wore their own shoes to minimize any shoe-type effect by introducing discomfort or lack of adaptability due to the usage of a new shoe. Each subject was seated, with the trunk, thigh, and shank secured. Standard positioning for the ankle

inversion and eversion testing was used according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Subjects were seated and their right leg was raised so that the shank was perpendicular to the footplate attachment. With the shank supported, the right foot was secured into the footplate in neutral position and SCH900776 zero degrees plantarflexion. Isokinetic testing of the right ankle was administered at 120°/s within a comfortable range of motion (mean ± SD) for barefoot condition (76.8° ± 12.1°) and shod condition (71.1° ± 16.7°). Three maximal repetitions were performed. A minimum of 24 h of rest was required before the subject returned to undergo testing under the second condition. Presentation of barefoot and shod conditions was randomized between subjects. Prior to each recorded performance, the subject was allowed to perform submaximal and maximal repetitions to prepare for each tested velocity. Verbal encouragement and visual feedback of the results were given in order to obtain maximal effort. After all testing was completed three subjects (subjects 2, 6, and 10) were eliminated from the analysis due to

errors in data collection. Inversion and eversion peak torque and time to peak torque was recorded for barefoot and shod conditions and the difference between conditions

was calculated. A 1210477 A positive (+) difference indicated that the barefoot condition demonstrated greater torque and a negative (−) difference indicated that the shod condition demonstrated greater torque. A difference near zero would indicate similar torque values in both the barefoot and shod conditions. For purposes of this study, either a large + or large – difference in peak torque between conditions was considered detrimental. This is because, whether or not + or −, the shoes had an affect on performance. In one case, a large + difference, because in the shoe condition the athlete was weaker and for a large – difference the shoe has made the athlete artificially stronger. Therefore, the absolute values of the differences were then ranked. The largest absolute difference between barefoot and shod conditions was ranked as a 1 and the smallest absolute difference was ranked as an 8. For time to peak torque + difference indicated that the barefoot condition demonstrated a greater amount of time to reach peak and a – difference indicated that the shod condition demonstrated a greater amount of time to reach peak torque. In addition, eversion-to-inversion peak torque percent strength ratios were also calculated for both barefoot and shod conditions.

Comments are closed.